Iowa State Bank
Sac City, IA FDIC 10497 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▼ 1.47% -0.18 1.65%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 12.70% -2.05 14.75%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▼ 3.17% -0.05 3.23%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▼ 52.91% +3.23 49.68%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▼ $1 -0.22 $1
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 2.12% -0.12 2.24%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $213 +14.99 $198
Gross Loans ($M) ▼ $153 -7.91 $161
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▼ 80.43% -10.46 90.89%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $187 +13.16 $174
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $25 +1.93 $23
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $24 +1.93 $22
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $26 +2.54 $23
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▼ 80.43% -10.46 90.89%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 1.66% +1.49 0.17%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.58% -0.09% 1.67%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▼ 1.84% +1.63 0.21%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▃▇██▇▆ Net Interest Margin (%) 2.88% 2.91% 3.00% 3.23% 3.31% 3.34% 3.25% 3.17%
▁▁▂▆██▇▃ Return on Assets (%) 1.37% 1.38% 1.42% 1.65% 1.75% 1.75% 1.66% 1.47%
▇▇█▃▁▁▃▇ Efficiency Ratio (%) 52.4% 52.4% 53.6% 49.7% 48.2% 48.5% 50.2% 52.9%
██▅▆▄▃▁▄ Cost of Funds (%) 2.42% 2.40% 2.18% 2.24% 2.16% 2.12% 1.94% 2.12%
▃▂▂▁▁▂▇█ NPA / Assets (%) 0.59% 0.52% 0.48% 0.17% 0.18% 0.52% 1.35% 1.66%
▃▃▃▁▁▁▆█ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.72% 0.63% 0.63% 0.21% 0.22% 0.20% 1.37% 1.84%
▁▁▂▄▅▇██ Tang. Book Value ($M) $21 $21 $21 $22 $23 $23 $23 $24
▅▅▃▅▆█▅▁ Gross Loans ($M) $160 $161 $157 $161 $162 $166 $160 $153
▁▁▃▂▂▄█▇ Total Deposits ($M) $170 $170 $177 $174 $176 $179 $192 $187
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate70%
C&I / Commercial10%
Agricultural13%
Consumer6%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand17%
Interest-Bearing (core)74%
Brokered / Other9%
← PreviousIowa Falls State Bank
Next →Iowa State Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?