Longview Community Bank
Mount Pulaski, IL FDIC 11319 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▼ 0.82% -0.00 0.82%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 6.82% -0.06 6.88%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 3.83% +0.07 3.76%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▼ 64.80% +0.42 64.38%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $1 +0.24 $1
Cost of Funds (%) ▼ 1.81% +0.33 1.49%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $317 +54.97 $262
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $226 +41.90 $184
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 84.40% +0.11 84.29%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $265 +49.01 $216
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $38 +7.08 $31
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $25 +5.19 $20
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $27 +5.87 $21
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 84.40% +0.11 84.29%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 1.73% +1.02 0.71%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.87% -0.04% 0.91%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▼ 2.40% +1.39 1.01%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▲ 11.87% +1.86 10.01%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▇█▁▂▁▁▁▂ Net Interest Margin (%) 4.31% 4.47% 3.71% 3.76% 3.72% 3.74% 3.65% 3.83%
█▇▁▃▁▃▂▃ Return on Assets (%) 0.99% 0.93% 0.76% 0.82% 0.74% 0.82% 0.78% 0.82%
▁▂█▆▃▃▆▆ Efficiency Ratio (%) 59.0% 60.5% 67.5% 64.4% 62.2% 61.8% 64.5% 64.8%
▃▂▂▁▂▅▁█ Cost of Funds (%) 1.58% 1.55% 1.55% 1.49% 1.54% 1.66% 1.50% 1.81%
▁▁▁▃▇██▇ NPA / Assets (%) 0.05% 0.03% 0.16% 0.71% 1.76% 2.04% 2.07% 1.73%
▁▁▁▃▇██▇ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.07% 0.04% 0.21% 1.01% 2.47% 2.89% 3.01% 2.40%
▁▁▆▆▆▇▇█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $8 $8 $19 $20 $20 $21 $21 $25
▁▁▆▆▇▇▆█ Gross Loans ($M) $69 $74 $181 $184 $192 $189 $185 $226
▁▁▆▆▆▆▇█ Total Deposits ($M) $89 $85 $211 $216 $220 $217 $222 $265
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate70%
C&I / Commercial5%
Agricultural17%
Consumer4%
Other4%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand16%
Interest-Bearing (core)66%
Brokered / Other17%
← PreviousLongview Bank
Next →Marquette Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?