Security State Bank
Farwell, TX FDIC 11907 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▼ 2.86% -0.05 2.90%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 20.93% -1.46 22.39%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 4.21% +0.13 4.08%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▼ 35.12% +2.05 33.07%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $2 +0.04 $2
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 2.19% -0.35 2.55%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $338 +15.70 $322
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $268 +36.68 $232
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 92.06% +9.54 82.52%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $288 +10.14 $278
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $49 +5.42 $43
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $49 +5.42 $43
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $50 +4.92 $45
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 92.06% +9.54 82.52%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 1.18% +1.11 0.07%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.04% 0.18% 0.86%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.03% -0.07 0.10%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▃▃▁▄▅█▇█ Net Interest Margin (%) 4.05% 4.06% 4.00% 4.08% 4.12% 4.20% 4.16% 4.21%
▃▁█▅▄▁█▅ Return on Assets (%) 2.61% 2.07% 3.58% 2.90% 2.77% 2.14% 3.62% 2.86%
▂▆▁▂▃█▁▃ Efficiency Ratio (%) 31.6% 42.0% 28.5% 33.1% 33.9% 47.0% 30.2% 35.1%
█▄▄▆▅█▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.72% 2.43% 2.39% 2.55% 2.50% 2.75% 2.17% 2.19%
███▁▁▁▁▆ NPA / Assets (%) 1.76% 1.62% 1.61% 0.07% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 1.18%
█▇▇▁▁▁▁▁ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 2.65% 2.28% 2.20% 0.10% 0.03% 0.03% 0.03% 0.03%
▂▁▃▄▆▅▇█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $40 $39 $41 $43 $45 $44 $47 $49
▁▄▅▅▅███ Gross Loans ($M) $190 $221 $230 $232 $236 $264 $269 $268
▁▄▄▅▆█▇▇ Total Deposits ($M) $253 $272 $272 $278 $285 $300 $288 $288
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate56%
C&I / Commercial33%
Agricultural10%
Consumer1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand14%
Interest-Bearing (core)80%
Brokered / Other6%
← PreviousSecurity Bank of Texas
Next →Security State Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?