Katahdin Trust Company
Patten, ME FDIC 12874 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▼ 0.90% -0.04 0.94%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 9.27% -1.00 10.27%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 3.94% +0.13 3.80%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 68.38% -3.19 71.57%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $4 +0.68 $3
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.52% -0.10 1.62%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $1,158 +72.51 $1,086
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $931 +83.97 $847
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 95.43% +5.74 89.69%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $966 +31.02 $935
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $110 +9.67 $101
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $105 +9.68 $95
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $112 +9.59 $103
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 95.43% +5.74 89.69%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 0.39% +0.26 0.13%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.96% -0.02% 0.98%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▼ 0.48% +0.32 0.16%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▼ 12.71% -0.54 13.25%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▂▄▅▇███ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.65% 3.69% 3.76% 3.80% 3.87% 3.90% 3.93% 3.94%
▃▁▃▅▆█▄▂ Return on Assets (%) 0.90% 0.86% 0.91% 0.94% 0.96% 1.01% 0.92% 0.90%
█▇█▇▄▂▂▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 71.8% 71.6% 72.1% 71.6% 70.1% 69.3% 69.0% 68.4%
█▆▄▄▃▂▁▂ Cost of Funds (%) 1.80% 1.67% 1.61% 1.62% 1.56% 1.50% 1.44% 1.52%
▁▁▁▁██▆▅ NPA / Assets (%) 0.15% 0.13% 0.13% 0.13% 0.55% 0.54% 0.41% 0.39%
▁▁▁▁██▆▅ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.19% 0.17% 0.16% 0.16% 0.71% 0.70% 0.52% 0.48%
█▁▂▂▅▆▆▇ Tang. Book Value ($M) $108 $91 $94 $95 $100 $103 $103 $105
▁▁▃▃▃▄▅█ Gross Loans ($M) $818 $825 $853 $847 $851 $868 $883 $931
▁▅▅▅▆█▇█ Total Deposits ($M) $887 $931 $930 $935 $938 $963 $953 $966
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate79%
C&I / Commercial17%
Other3%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand21%
Interest-Bearing (core)59%
Brokered / Other21%
← PreviousFranklin Savings Bank
Next →Kennebec Savings Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?