The Riley State Bank of Riley, Kansas
Riley, KS FDIC 16120 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 1.48% +0.03 1.44%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 14.60% -0.14 14.74%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 3.81% +0.10 3.71%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 57.62% -2.27 59.89%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $1 +0.09 $0
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.70% -0.12 1.81%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $132 +10.43 $122
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $89 +10.77 $79
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 76.39% +1.85 74.53%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $115 +11.31 $104
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $13 +1.21 $12
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $13 +1.21 $12
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $15 +1.38 $14
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 76.39% +1.85 74.53%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.46% 0.06% 1.41%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▇▇▇▇██ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.36% 3.41% 3.71% 3.71% 3.71% 3.72% 3.77% 3.81%
▂▁█▆▆▃█▇ Return on Assets (%) 1.14% 1.03% 1.61% 1.44% 1.45% 1.25% 1.62% 1.48%
▇█▂▂▂▅▁▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 66.1% 68.3% 59.2% 59.9% 59.8% 63.1% 58.2% 57.6%
███▄▅▄▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 1.95% 1.95% 1.94% 1.81% 1.85% 1.80% 1.70% 1.70%
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ NPA / Assets (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
▂▁▃▄▆▇██ Tang. Book Value ($M) $11 $11 $12 $12 $13 $13 $13 $13
▁▄▅▃▂▆▇█ Gross Loans ($M) $73 $80 $82 $79 $77 $84 $86 $89
▁▁▂▃▃▅██ Total Deposits ($M) $97 $99 $101 $104 $104 $107 $114 $115
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate35%
C&I / Commercial21%
Agricultural39%
Consumer5%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand18%
Interest-Bearing (core)62%
Brokered / Other20%
← PreviousThe Peoples Bank
Next →The Solomon State Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?