Reliabank Dakota
Estelline, SD FDIC 16221 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 1.37% +0.62 0.76%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 17.28% +5.09 12.19%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 3.32% +0.63 2.69%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 58.91% -14.18 73.09%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $3 +1.13 $2
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.96% -0.25 2.21%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $788 +47.84 $741
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $529 +56.32 $473
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 79.14% +3.19 75.94%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $664 +46.68 $617
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $64 +17.29 $47
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $64 +17.29 $47
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $75 +16.30 $59
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 79.14% +3.19 75.94%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.18% -0.24 0.42%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.82% -0.17% 0.99%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.26% -0.39 0.66%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▼ 14.06% -0.11 14.17%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▃▄▅▆██ Net Interest Margin (%) 2.12% 2.18% 2.48% 2.69% 2.81% 2.91% 3.27% 3.32%
▁▁▂▃▄▆▇█ Return on Assets (%) 0.39% 0.48% 0.54% 0.76% 0.87% 1.06% 1.25% 1.37%
█▇█▆▅▃▁▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 80.9% 78.0% 78.9% 73.1% 69.9% 66.3% 61.6% 58.9%
█▇▅▃▃▁▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.75% 2.58% 2.39% 2.21% 2.19% 2.06% 1.99% 1.96%
▆▅███▃▁▁ NPA / Assets (%) 0.36% 0.33% 0.40% 0.42% 0.42% 0.24% 0.18% 0.18%
▇▆███▃▁▁ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.59% 0.55% 0.66% 0.66% 0.65% 0.38% 0.27% 0.26%
▂▁▁▁▅▆▇█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $50 $46 $48 $47 $55 $59 $60 $64
▃▂▁▂▃▄▆█ Gross Loans ($M) $479 $469 $460 $473 $486 $492 $512 $529
▆▇▃▂▁▄▅█ Total Deposits ($M) $650 $655 $622 $617 $609 $636 $638 $664
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate60%
C&I / Commercial21%
Agricultural18%
Consumer1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand18%
Interest-Bearing (core)72%
Brokered / Other9%
← PreviousQuoin Financial Bank
Next →Rivers Edge Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?