Bridge City State Bank
Bridge City, TX FDIC 18155 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 1.09% +0.01 1.08%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 13.44% -1.97 15.41%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▼ 3.62% -0.01 3.63%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 65.74% -0.49 66.23%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $1 +0.04 $1
Cost of Funds (%) ▼ 1.40% +0.05 1.35%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $247 +6.54 $240
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $135 +9.73 $125
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 66.79% +2.12 64.67%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $200 +8.32 $191
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $22 +4.52 $17
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $22 +4.52 $17
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $26 +4.49 $21
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 66.79% +2.12 64.67%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.04% -0.07 0.11%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.97% 0.02% 0.95%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.08% -0.13 0.21%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▲ 20.16% +0.11 20.05%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
██▄▅▅▆▁▅ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.72% 3.71% 3.59% 3.63% 3.62% 3.65% 3.48% 3.62%
▅▁▁▄▆█▄▅ Return on Assets (%) 1.09% 1.00% 1.02% 1.08% 1.12% 1.16% 1.06% 1.09%
▇██▅▂▁▃▄ Efficiency Ratio (%) 67.5% 68.1% 67.7% 66.2% 64.8% 64.1% 65.2% 65.7%
▁▇███▇██ Cost of Funds (%) 0.95% 1.33% 1.40% 1.35% 1.39% 1.34% 1.35% 1.40%
███▄▃▁▁▁ NPA / Assets (%) 0.22% 0.20% 0.20% 0.11% 0.10% 0.06% 0.05% 0.04%
█▄▄▃▃▁▁▁ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.46% 0.24% 0.23% 0.21% 0.20% 0.11% 0.11% 0.08%
▄▁▂▃▆█▇█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $18 $15 $17 $17 $19 $21 $20 $22
▁▄▆▆▆▇▆█ Gross Loans ($M) $101 $117 $122 $125 $126 $128 $125 $135
▂▁▁▂███▄ Total Deposits ($M) $192 $187 $186 $191 $217 $215 $219 $200
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate84%
C&I / Commercial14%
Consumer1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand29%
Interest-Bearing (core)57%
Brokered / Other14%
← PreviousBig Bend Banks, N.A.
Next →Broadstreet Bank S S B

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?