Community State Bank of Missouri
Bowling Green, MO FDIC 1936 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q1'26
Data as of March 31, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q1'26 YoY Δ Q1'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) 1.64% -0.22 1.86%
Return on Equity (%) 15.59% -2.06 17.65%
Net Interest Margin (%) 3.56% +0.54 3.02%
Efficiency Ratio (%) 54.99% +2.13 52.86%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) $1 -0.05 $1
Cost of Funds (%) 1.67% -0.16 1.84%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) $342 +24.19 $318
Gross Loans ($M) $234 +12.91 $221
Loan Growth YoY (%) 76.05% -1.36 77.41%
Total Deposits ($M) $306 +22.26 $283
Shareholders Equity ($M) $35 +1.85 $33
Tang. Book Value ($M) $35 +1.85 $33
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** $38 +2.33 $36
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) 76.05% -1.36 77.41%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) 0.18% +0.04 0.14%
Allowance / Loans (%) 0.73% -0.11% 0.84%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.27% +0.06 0.21%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q2'24 Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26
█▆▅▁▂▂▃█ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.60% 3.45% 3.33% 3.02% 3.14% 3.11% 3.23% 3.56%
▄▂▁█▅▃▄▅ Return on Assets (%) 1.57% 1.43% 1.35% 1.86% 1.63% 1.49% 1.57% 1.64%
▅▇█▁▃▅▃▃ Efficiency Ratio (%) 57.6% 60.3% 61.3% 52.9% 55.7% 57.9% 56.0% 55.0%
▁▆███▇▁▃ Cost of Funds (%) 1.57% 1.76% 1.85% 1.84% 1.83% 1.79% 1.60% 1.67%
█▂▁▁▄▂▃▃ NPA / Assets (%) 0.25% 0.16% 0.15% 0.14% 0.19% 0.17% 0.18% 0.18%
█▁▁▁▄▂▄▄ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.34% 0.21% 0.22% 0.21% 0.27% 0.23% 0.26% 0.27%
▁▃▃▂▄▆█▅ Tang. Book Value ($M) $32 $34 $34 $33 $35 $36 $38 $35
▃▂▁▂▄▆█▇ Gross Loans ($M) $223 $223 $218 $221 $228 $233 $239 $234
▁▁▅▅▅▅██ Total Deposits ($M) $250 $255 $284 $283 $286 $282 $310 $306
Portfolio Composition — Q1'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate82%
C&I / Commercial12%
Agricultural4%
Consumer1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand19%
Interest-Bearing (core)69%
Brokered / Other12%
← PreviousCommunity State Bank
Next →Concordia Bank of Concordia, Missouri

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?