Scale Bank
Edina, MN FDIC 20268 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 2.32% +0.35 1.97%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 11.86% +2.39 9.47%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 7.69% +1.76 5.93%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 59.30% -3.07 62.37%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $4 +1.51 $3
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.17% -0.00 1.18%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $627 +106.69 $520
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $512 +130.87 $381
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 119.90% +25.76 94.14%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $423 +22.50 $401
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $117 +5.54 $111
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▼ $77 -4.32 $81
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▼ $79 -4.02 $83
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 119.90% +25.76 94.14%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.05% -0.01 0.05%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.89% -0.12% 1.01%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.06% -0.01 0.07%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▁▁▁▃██ Net Interest Margin (%) 5.82% 5.96% 5.78% 5.93% 5.93% 6.43% 7.62% 7.69%
▅▁▂▅▅▇▄█ Return on Assets (%) 2.00% 1.51% 1.69% 1.97% 2.01% 2.20% 1.87% 2.32%
▄▂█▅▄▂█▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 61.6% 60.1% 65.1% 62.4% 61.8% 60.2% 64.9% 59.3%
██▃▄▂▄▁▄ Cost of Funds (%) 1.36% 1.37% 1.14% 1.18% 1.09% 1.17% 1.02% 1.17%
▁▂█▁█▃▂▁ NPA / Assets (%) 0.03% 0.06% 0.20% 0.05% 0.22% 0.09% 0.08% 0.05%
▁▂█▁█▃▂▁ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.05% 0.09% 0.29% 0.07% 0.30% 0.11% 0.10% 0.06%
▇▄▆▇█▁▂▄ Tang. Book Value ($M) $81 $77 $79 $81 $83 $72 $74 $77
▃▁▁▂▃▅▅█ Gross Loans ($M) $400 $366 $362 $381 $404 $453 $452 $512
▇▄▂▁█▆▁▆ Total Deposits ($M) $425 $414 $406 $401 $431 $424 $404 $423
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate21%
C&I / Commercial50%
Other29%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand40%
Interest-Bearing (core)52%
Brokered / Other9%
← PreviousRushford State Bank (Incorporated)
Next →Security Bank & Trust Company

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?