Peoples Bank of Graceville
Graceville, FL FDIC 21692 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 1.02% +0.25 0.77%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 14.43% +1.76 12.67%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 2.50% +0.27 2.24%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 63.00% -6.02 69.02%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $0 +0.09 $0
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.70% -0.17 1.87%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $116 +4.76 $111
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $43 +3.02 $40
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 39.74% +1.61 38.12%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $107 +3.42 $103
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $9 +1.36 $7
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $9 +1.36 $7
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $12 +1.50 $11
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 39.74% +1.61 38.12%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 0.13% +0.13 0.00%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.89% -0.07% 0.95%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▼ 0.34% +0.34 0.00%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▼ 30.21% -1.14 31.36%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▃▃▄▅▇█ Net Interest Margin (%) 2.09% 2.11% 2.20% 2.24% 2.25% 2.34% 2.44% 2.50%
▁▁▁▂▃▄▇█ Return on Assets (%) 0.71% 0.71% 0.74% 0.77% 0.79% 0.86% 0.97% 1.02%
████▆▄▂▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 69.6% 69.6% 69.6% 69.0% 67.8% 66.2% 64.0% 63.0%
█▆▇█▄▆▁▂ Cost of Funds (%) 1.90% 1.81% 1.84% 1.87% 1.77% 1.82% 1.66% 1.70%
▁▁▁▁▁▁██ NPA / Assets (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.12% 0.13%
▁▁▁▁▁▁██ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.35% 0.34%
▂▁▂▄▆▆▇█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $7 $6 $7 $7 $8 $8 $8 $9
▁▂▄▁▅▃▅█ Gross Loans ($M) $39 $40 $41 $40 $41 $41 $41 $43
█▄▁▁█▂▇▄ Total Deposits ($M) $110 $106 $103 $103 $110 $104 $109 $107
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate84%
C&I / Commercial4%
Agricultural2%
Consumer9%
Other1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand21%
Interest-Bearing (core)64%
Brokered / Other15%
← PreviousParadise Bank
Next →Pibank, National Association

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?