Premier Bank
Maplewood, MN FDIC 21714 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 1.95% +0.40 1.55%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 20.03% +4.10 15.93%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 4.44% +0.59 3.84%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 39.65% -5.38 45.03%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $8 +1.81 $6
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.55% -0.27 1.82%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $1,184 +93.77 $1,091
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $894 +68.68 $825
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▼ 84.11% -2.47 86.58%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $1,048 +108.49 $939
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $113 +5.48 $108
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $113 +5.48 $108
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $121 +6.06 $115
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▼ 84.11% -2.47 86.58%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.00% -0.06 0.06%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.40% -0.04% 1.43%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.00% -0.08 0.09%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▼ 12.48% -0.45 12.93%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▂▃▄▅██ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.51% 3.55% 3.74% 3.84% 3.96% 4.01% 4.46% 4.44%
▁▁▃▃▄▄██ Return on Assets (%) 1.36% 1.39% 1.58% 1.55% 1.65% 1.66% 1.98% 1.95%
██▅▆▅▅▁▂ Efficiency Ratio (%) 48.1% 47.9% 43.4% 45.0% 43.1% 43.3% 37.5% 39.6%
█▆▆▅▄▂▃▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.04% 1.91% 1.89% 1.82% 1.77% 1.66% 1.70% 1.55%
▂▁█▁▁▁▁▁ NPA / Assets (%) 0.13% 0.05% 0.97% 0.06% 0.06% 0.04% 0.00% 0.00%
▁▁█▁▁▁▁▁ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.08% 0.07% 1.27% 0.09% 0.08% 0.05% 0.00% 0.00%
▁▁▄▃▇▅█▆ Tang. Book Value ($M) $105 $104 $110 $108 $114 $111 $117 $113
▄▂▁▁▂▄██ Gross Loans ($M) $851 $841 $833 $825 $839 $852 $893 $894
▁▄▁▁▁▅▇█ Total Deposits ($M) $934 $989 $934 $939 $933 $993 $1,033 $1,048
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate89%
C&I / Commercial9%
Other1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand18%
Interest-Bearing (core)73%
Brokered / Other8%
← PreviousPrairie Sun Bank
Next →Premier Bank Minnesota

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?