First State Bank of DeQueen
De Queen, AR FDIC 21805 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 1.52% +0.09 1.43%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 22.15% -2.56 24.71%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 3.38% +0.13 3.25%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 53.49% -2.59 56.08%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $2 +0.37 $2
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 2.73% -0.19 2.92%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $525 +59.96 $465
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $296 +22.92 $273
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▼ 62.96% -3.54 66.50%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $464 +58.90 $405
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $35 +8.38 $27
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $35 +8.38 $27
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $45 +10.24 $35
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▼ 62.96% -3.54 66.50%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 0.72% +0.08 0.64%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.36% -0.05% 1.41%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▼ 1.23% +0.14 1.09%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▂▃▇▇▇█ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.17% 3.18% 3.21% 3.25% 3.35% 3.34% 3.33% 3.38%
▁▁▄▆█▅▇▇ Return on Assets (%) 1.16% 1.17% 1.37% 1.43% 1.58% 1.40% 1.52% 1.52%
██▄▃▂▃▁▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 63.5% 62.4% 57.4% 56.1% 54.3% 56.0% 52.5% 53.5%
▂█▄▄▅▃▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.84% 3.20% 2.92% 2.92% 3.01% 2.88% 2.76% 2.73%
█▄▁▁▂▁▁▂ NPA / Assets (%) 1.17% 0.85% 0.71% 0.64% 0.74% 0.67% 0.66% 0.72%
█▃▁▁▂▁▁▂ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 1.99% 1.39% 1.16% 1.09% 1.28% 1.18% 1.15% 1.23%
▂▁▄▃██▆▇ Tang. Book Value ($M) $25 $22 $28 $27 $36 $38 $33 $35
▁▂▃▅▆▇▇█ Gross Loans ($M) $241 $251 $261 $273 $279 $284 $288 $296
▁▁▂▄▆▇██ Total Deposits ($M) $354 $363 $377 $405 $428 $452 $471 $464
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate87%
C&I / Commercial7%
Agricultural3%
Consumer2%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand8%
Interest-Bearing (core)66%
Brokered / Other26%
← PreviousFirst State Bank
Next →First Western Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?