Barwick Banking Company
Barwick, GA FDIC 22205 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 0.87% +0.26 0.62%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 10.23% +2.51 7.72%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 3.92% +0.17 3.75%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 62.77% -7.21 69.99%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $3 +1.11 $2
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 2.38% -0.15 2.54%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $830 +187.72 $642
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $701 +168.43 $532
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 98.82% +3.95 94.87%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $702 +146.79 $555
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $71 +18.66 $52
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $71 +18.66 $52
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $73 +19.39 $54
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 98.82% +3.95 94.87%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 0.41% +0.38 0.04%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.98% -0.04% 1.02%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▼ 0.49% +0.45 0.04%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▲ 9.60% +0.45 9.15%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▂▅▆▇██ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.53% 3.54% 3.62% 3.75% 3.82% 3.84% 3.90% 3.92%
▃▄▁▂▄▅▇█ Return on Assets (%) 0.63% 0.67% 0.54% 0.62% 0.69% 0.74% 0.82% 0.87%
▇▆█▆▅▄▂▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 71.0% 70.1% 73.0% 70.0% 68.5% 67.2% 64.5% 62.8%
█▇▃▂▃▂▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 3.07% 2.91% 2.54% 2.54% 2.60% 2.47% 2.36% 2.38%
▁▁▁▁▄▄▃█ NPA / Assets (%) 0.07% 0.08% 0.08% 0.04% 0.21% 0.19% 0.17% 0.41%
▁▂▁▁▃▃▃█ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.09% 0.10% 0.09% 0.04% 0.17% 0.17% 0.16% 0.49%
▁▁▂▃▄▆██ Tang. Book Value ($M) $42 $43 $48 $52 $56 $62 $67 $71
▁▁▂▄▅▆▇█ Gross Loans ($M) $422 $447 $486 $532 $567 $618 $663 $701
▁▁▃▃▄▄▆█ Total Deposits ($M) $479 $494 $544 $555 $581 $590 $644 $702
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate94%
C&I / Commercial5%
Agricultural1%
Consumer1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand22%
Interest-Bearing (core)59%
Brokered / Other19%
← PreviousBankSouth
Next →Carver State Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?