Bank of Alma
Alma, WI FDIC 26689 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▼ 3.16% -0.13 3.28%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 6.28% -0.39 6.67%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▼ 4.36% -0.43 4.79%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 12.03% -3.59 15.62%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $3 +0.05 $3
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 0.80% -0.09 0.89%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $340 +14.25 $325
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $202 +21.26 $180
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 119.48% +10.89 108.59%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $166 +2.90 $163
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $172 +11.38 $161
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $172 +11.38 $161
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $177 +13.02 $164
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 119.48% +10.89 108.59%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.64% -0.13 0.77%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.46% -0.17% 1.63%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.97% -0.42 1.39%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▲ 77.90% +77.90 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▇▅▅▆█▇▃▁ Net Interest Margin (%) 4.87% 4.75% 4.77% 4.79% 5.03% 4.93% 4.53% 4.36%
▁▁▇▄█▇▄▃ Return on Assets (%) 2.96% 3.04% 3.49% 3.28% 3.63% 3.49% 3.29% 3.16%
█▆▁▇▁▁▁▂ Efficiency Ratio (%) 17.1% 15.1% 11.0% 15.6% 11.1% 11.6% 11.7% 12.0%
▇█▇▇▇▄▂▁ Cost of Funds (%) 0.89% 0.91% 0.89% 0.89% 0.90% 0.85% 0.82% 0.80%
█▂▂▃▅▆▁▂ NPA / Assets (%) 1.31% 0.64% 0.63% 0.77% 0.98% 1.10% 0.53% 0.64%
█▁▁▄▆▇▁▂ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 2.08% 0.91% 0.91% 1.39% 1.74% 1.87% 0.79% 0.97%
▁▂▃▄▅▆▇█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $153 $156 $158 $161 $164 $167 $170 $172
▅▆▆▁▂▇██ Gross Loans ($M) $193 $195 $194 $180 $184 $197 $200 $202
▁▄▆▆▅▇█▇ Total Deposits ($M) $152 $160 $162 $163 $161 $166 $168 $166
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate85%
C&I / Commercial3%
Consumer1%
Other11%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand30%
Interest-Bearing (core)64%
Brokered / Other5%
← PreviousBank Five Nine
Next →Bank of Cashton

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?