Piedmont Federal Savings Bank
Winston Salem, NC FDIC 27619 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 0.21% +0.08 0.13%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 1.12% +0.43 0.69%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 2.42% +0.32 2.09%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 88.38% -4.47 92.86%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $1 +0.72 $0
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.98% -0.14 2.12%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $1,316 +32.96 $1,283
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $917 +94.17 $823
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 93.51% +7.07 86.44%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $974 +28.68 $945
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $241 +5.91 $235
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $230 +6.22 $224
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $242 +4.92 $237
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 93.51% +7.07 86.44%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 0.11% +0.03 0.08%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.76% -0.02% 0.78%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▼ 0.16% +0.03 0.13%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▂▄▄▅██ Net Interest Margin (%) 1.89% 1.91% 2.02% 2.09% 2.15% 2.18% 2.36% 2.42%
▁▂▇▇▇▇██ Return on Assets (%) -0.25% -0.16% 0.12% 0.13% 0.12% 0.14% 0.16% 0.21%
█▇▂▂▂▂▁▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 108.0% 104.2% 91.7% 92.9% 92.5% 91.3% 90.6% 88.4%
█▅▃▂▂▂▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.69% 2.38% 2.21% 2.12% 2.05% 2.04% 1.95% 1.98%
▁▆▁▆▅█▃█ NPA / Assets (%) 0.01% 0.08% 0.02% 0.08% 0.07% 0.10% 0.04% 0.11%
▁▆▁▇▆█▃█ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.02% 0.12% 0.03% 0.13% 0.11% 0.14% 0.06% 0.16%
▃▁▂▄▆███ Tang. Book Value ($M) $223 $219 $222 $224 $226 $229 $229 $230
▁▂▂▂▄▅▇█ Gross Loans ($M) $805 $829 $826 $823 $853 $872 $892 $917
▁▁▂▂▃▄▅█ Total Deposits ($M) $938 $936 $942 $945 $950 $955 $957 $974
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate96%
C&I / Commercial4%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand5%
Interest-Bearing (core)74%
Brokered / Other20%
← PreviousPeoples Bank
Next →Providence Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?