Hoyne Savings Bank Mutual
Chicago, IL FDIC 28747 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 0.18% +0.01 0.17%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 0.70% -0.27 0.97%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 3.92% +0.79 3.13%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▼ 89.95% +0.86 89.09%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $1 +0.03 $1
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 0.74% -0.70 1.44%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $480 +26.59 $453
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $285 +35.38 $250
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 81.44% +14.54 66.90%
Total Deposits ($M) ▼ $347 -23.27 $370
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $123 +42.23 $81
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $123 +42.42 $81
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $129 +41.61 $88
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 81.44% +14.54 66.90%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 0.35% +0.00 0.35%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.03% 0.07% 0.97%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▼ 0.34% +0.05 0.29%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▄▅▅▆██ Net Interest Margin (%) 2.27% 2.41% 3.00% 3.13% 3.19% 3.35% 3.72% 3.92%
▁▃▆▇▇█▆▇ Return on Assets (%) -0.68% -0.36% -0.01% 0.17% 0.20% 0.35% 0.05% 0.18%
█▇▃▂▂▁▃▂ Efficiency Ratio (%) 123.5% 118.0% 97.0% 89.1% 87.6% 82.3% 94.1% 89.9%
█▇▇▇▆▄▂▁ Cost of Funds (%) 1.66% 1.52% 1.43% 1.44% 1.40% 1.14% 0.96% 0.74%
▆█▇▅▇█▁▆ NPA / Assets (%) 0.36% 0.40% 0.38% 0.35% 0.38% 0.38% 0.28% 0.35%
██▃▂▂▄▁▃ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.73% 0.68% 0.36% 0.29% 0.33% 0.42% 0.21% 0.34%
▁▁▁▁▁███ Tang. Book Value ($M) $79 $77 $79 $81 $82 $123 $123 $123
▁▃▄▄▄▆██ Gross Loans ($M) $216 $243 $247 $250 $252 $272 $292 $285
▃▆█▆▆▃▁▁ Total Deposits ($M) $355 $370 $382 $370 $369 $357 $346 $347
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate90%
C&I / Commercial10%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand17%
Interest-Bearing (core)74%
Brokered / Other10%
← PreviousHometown National Bank
Next →INB, National Association

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?