Community Savings Bank Mutual
Chicago, IL FDIC 28841 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ -0.22% +0.32 -0.53%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ -1.87% +2.86 -4.73%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 2.39% +0.51 1.88%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 110.48% -25.43 135.90%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $-0 +0.46 $-1
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.59% -0.14 1.72%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $410 +0.43 $410
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $237 +9.81 $227
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 65.61% +3.57 62.05%
Total Deposits ($M) ▼ $357 -5.16 $362
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $47 +0.44 $47
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $47 +0.44 $47
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $54 +0.70 $54
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 65.61% +3.57 62.05%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.11% -0.05 0.16%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.02% 0.08% 0.94%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.20% -0.10 0.30%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▃▄▄▅██ Net Interest Margin (%) 1.50% 1.51% 1.80% 1.88% 1.94% 2.01% 2.30% 2.39%
▁▁▂▃▄▄▇█ Return on Assets (%) -0.70% -0.71% -0.62% -0.53% -0.48% -0.48% -0.32% -0.22%
██▆▅▄▃▂▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 158.0% 157.4% 144.0% 135.9% 131.4% 128.2% 117.2% 110.5%
██▄▃▃▃▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.05% 2.01% 1.80% 1.72% 1.71% 1.72% 1.60% 1.59%
█▂▃▆▁▄▄▄ NPA / Assets (%) 0.20% 0.08% 0.10% 0.16% 0.06% 0.12% 0.12% 0.11%
█▂▃▆▁▄▄▃ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.37% 0.15% 0.18% 0.30% 0.11% 0.21% 0.21% 0.20%
█▁▄▅▇█▆▆ Tang. Book Value ($M) $48 $45 $47 $47 $48 $48 $47 $47
▁▂▂▁▁▂▅█ Gross Loans ($M) $226 $228 $228 $227 $227 $228 $232 $237
▄█▄▅▆▃▃▁ Total Deposits ($M) $361 $367 $361 $362 $364 $361 $360 $357
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate100%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand2%
Interest-Bearing (core)89%
Brokered / Other10%
← PreviousCommunity Partners Savings Bank
Next →Community State Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?