Evergreen Federal Bank Mutual
Grants Pass, OR FDIC 28914 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 0.81% +0.24 0.57%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 6.24% +1.57 4.67%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 3.93% +0.43 3.50%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 66.15% -9.72 75.87%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $2 +0.70 $1
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.04% -0.19 1.23%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▼ $622 -1.95 $624
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $492 +6.57 $486
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 90.44% +2.31 88.13%
Total Deposits ($M) ▼ $537 -7.06 $544
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $82 +5.24 $77
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $82 +5.27 $77
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $84 +4.69 $79
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 90.44% +2.31 88.13%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.53% -0.18 0.71%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.40% 0.06% 1.34%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.63% -0.28 0.91%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▃▃▃▄▇█ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.31% 3.33% 3.49% 3.50% 3.52% 3.56% 3.84% 3.93%
▁▁▄▄▄▄██ Return on Assets (%) 0.40% 0.38% 0.55% 0.57% 0.58% 0.59% 0.78% 0.81%
██▇▆▆▆▁▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 77.8% 79.5% 77.0% 75.9% 75.7% 75.6% 65.8% 66.2%
▇▇▆▇█▇▂▁ Cost of Funds (%) 1.22% 1.23% 1.19% 1.23% 1.27% 1.23% 1.09% 1.04%
▁▅▄█▆█▅▃ NPA / Assets (%) 0.44% 0.58% 0.58% 0.71% 0.62% 0.68% 0.58% 0.53%
▁▄▄█▆▇▄▂ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.55% 0.72% 0.72% 0.91% 0.80% 0.86% 0.71% 0.63%
▁▁▂▃▅▆▇█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $74 $74 $75 $77 $78 $79 $81 $82
▅█▃▂▂▁▁█ Gross Loans ($M) $488 $492 $487 $486 $485 $484 $484 $492
▁▁▆██▆█▆ Total Deposits ($M) $514 $512 $534 $544 $547 $535 $545 $537
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate99%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand10%
Interest-Bearing (core)79%
Brokered / Other10%
← PreviousClackamas County Bank
Next →First Federal Savings and Loan Association of McMinnville

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?