Five Star Bank
Roseville, CA FDIC 35361 $5B-$10B
Quarter Ended
Q1'26
Data as of March 31, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q1'26 YoY Δ Q1'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) 1.64% +0.25 1.39%
Return on Equity (%) 15.85% +3.26 12.59%
Net Interest Margin (%) 3.85% +0.30 3.55%
Efficiency Ratio (%) 36.18% -3.63 39.81%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) $30 +7.53 $22
Cost of Funds (%) 1.81% -0.26 2.07%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) $5,032 +788.22 $4,243
Gross Loans ($M) $4,213 +588.91 $3,624
Loan Growth YoY (%) 93.01% -2.70 95.70%
Total Deposits ($M) $4,480 +734.01 $3,746
Shareholders Equity ($M) $512 +50.19 $462
Tang. Book Value ($M) $511 +50.66 $460
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** $515 +50.37 $465
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) 93.01% -2.70 95.70%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) 0.06% +0.01 0.04%
Allowance / Loans (%) 1.10% 0.02% 1.08%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.07% +0.02 0.05%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) 11.67% -0.80 12.48%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q2'24 Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26
▁▁▂▃▄▅▆█ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.44% 3.46% 3.51% 3.55% 3.61% 3.66% 3.71% 3.85%
▁▁▁▂▃▄▆█ Return on Assets (%) 1.35% 1.32% 1.36% 1.39% 1.44% 1.48% 1.52% 1.64%
██▇▇▆▅▅▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 40.4% 40.2% 39.6% 39.8% 39.0% 38.5% 38.4% 36.2%
▅▇█▅▅▅▃▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.06% 2.17% 2.28% 2.07% 2.08% 2.10% 1.95% 1.81%
▄▃▂▁▃▁█▅ NPA / Assets (%) 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.04% 0.05% 0.05% 0.07% 0.06%
▃▂▁▁▄▂█▆ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.06% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.06% 0.05% 0.08% 0.07%
▁▁▂▃▄▆▇█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $439 $446 $454 $460 $472 $485 $500 $511
▁▂▃▃▅▆▇█ Gross Loans ($M) $3,272 $3,463 $3,536 $3,624 $3,758 $3,887 $4,075 $4,213
▁▂▃▄▅▆▇█ Total Deposits ($M) $3,159 $3,409 $3,567 $3,746 $3,904 $4,112 $4,210 $4,480
Portfolio Composition — Q1'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate87%
C&I / Commercial6%
Consumer7%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand28%
Interest-Bearing (core)63%
Brokered / Other9%
← PreviousFirst Pacific Bank
Next →Fremont Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?