The Idabel National Bank
Idabel, OK FDIC 4241 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 0.92% +0.31 0.61%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 6.15% +1.58 4.57%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 3.49% +0.40 3.09%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 49.02% -7.04 56.06%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $1 +0.32 $1
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.82% -0.35 2.18%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▼ $242 -10.35 $253
Gross Loans ($M) ▼ $156 -27.68 $184
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▼ 74.79% -9.40 84.20%
Total Deposits ($M) ▼ $202 -11.06 $213
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $37 +2.84 $34
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $37 +2.84 $34
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $41 +3.62 $38
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▼ 74.79% -9.40 84.20%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 5.71% -0.64 6.35%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 3.50% 0.85% 2.65%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 8.39% -0.25 8.64%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▲ 23.53% +3.91 19.62%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▂▂▁▂▃▃▅█ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.07% 3.09% 2.98% 3.09% 3.14% 3.17% 3.29% 3.49%
█▆▂▁▁▁▄▅ Return on Assets (%) 1.31% 1.10% 0.66% 0.61% 0.56% 0.51% 0.84% 0.92%
▁▃█▇▅█▄▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 48.2% 50.7% 57.6% 56.1% 53.9% 56.5% 52.8% 49.0%
██▅▄▄▂▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.54% 2.45% 2.26% 2.18% 2.13% 1.97% 1.86% 1.82%
▂▁▇████▆ NPA / Assets (%) 4.02% 3.49% 6.02% 6.35% 6.50% 6.53% 6.43% 5.71%
▂▁▆▇███▇ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 5.33% 4.57% 8.02% 8.64% 9.03% 9.60% 9.40% 8.39%
▄▁▃▂▆▇██ Tang. Book Value ($M) $35 $34 $35 $34 $36 $37 $37 $37
█▇▆▅▄▃▂▁ Gross Loans ($M) $202 $193 $189 $184 $179 $170 $166 $156
█▄▄▄▃▃▃▁ Total Deposits ($M) $229 $215 $213 $213 $209 $211 $209 $202
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate93%
C&I / Commercial3%
Consumer4%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand19%
Interest-Bearing (core)45%
Brokered / Other36%
← PreviousThe First State Bank
Next →The Pauls Valley National Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?