Farmers Bank & Trust
Atwood, KS FDIC 4621 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 1.43% +0.31 1.12%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 19.04% -0.53 19.57%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 3.88% +0.88 3.01%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▼ 57.34% +1.14 56.20%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $1 +0.14 $1
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.14% -0.63 1.78%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▼ $159 -6.70 $166
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $93 +10.78 $82
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 63.69% +10.93 52.76%
Total Deposits ($M) ▼ $145 -9.84 $155
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $13 +3.10 $10
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $13 +3.10 $10
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $16 +2.43 $13
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 63.69% +10.93 52.76%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.44% -0.20 0.64%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.10% 0.03% 1.07%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.75% -0.53 1.28%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▼ 0.00% -15.03 15.03%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▂▃▅▅▇█ Net Interest Margin (%) 2.67% 2.60% 2.91% 3.01% 3.26% 3.33% 3.72% 3.88%
▅▅█▆▁▂▆█ Return on Assets (%) 1.03% 1.02% 1.33% 1.12% 0.52% 0.63% 1.17% 1.43%
██▁▁▁▁▃▂ Efficiency Ratio (%) 70.2% 69.2% 55.0% 56.2% 55.1% 54.5% 59.0% 57.3%
█▇█▆▃▄▂▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.00% 1.84% 1.94% 1.78% 1.45% 1.49% 1.34% 1.14%
▁▁▁▇▃▄█▅ NPA / Assets (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.64% 0.24% 0.28% 0.74% 0.44%
▁▁▁█▃▄█▅ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 1.28% 0.48% 0.53% 1.40% 0.75%
▂▁▁▂▃▅▄█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $10 $10 $10 $10 $11 $12 $11 $13
▁▃▃▄▄▇▅█ Gross Loans ($M) $73 $79 $79 $82 $82 $88 $83 $93
▁█▅▄▄▅▃▃ Total Deposits ($M) $134 $175 $158 $155 $151 $156 $146 $145
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate42%
C&I / Commercial24%
Agricultural29%
Consumer3%
Other1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand15%
Interest-Bearing (core)78%
Brokered / Other7%
← PreviousFarmers Bank & Trust
Next →Farmers National Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?