Walden Mutual Bank
Concord, NH FDIC 59289 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 0.02% +0.26 -0.24%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 0.25% +2.28 -2.03%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▼ 3.98% -0.01 3.99%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 92.00% -10.77 102.77%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $0 +0.10 $0
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.87% -0.21 2.07%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $193 +46.57 $146
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $127 +21.00 $106
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▼ 72.83% -8.89 81.72%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $173 +44.40 $129
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $18 +1.99 $16
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $18 +1.99 $16
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $20 +2.80 $17
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▼ 72.83% -8.89 81.72%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 2.31% +0.37 1.94%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.68% 0.00% 0.68%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▼ 3.50% +0.83 2.67%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▂▄▆███▆ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.76% 3.82% 3.92% 3.99% 4.06% 4.08% 4.06% 3.98%
▁▁▇██▇██ Return on Assets (%) -3.55% -3.23% -0.64% -0.24% -0.12% -0.77% 0.01% 0.02%
█▇▅▄▂▁▁▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 122.6% 116.7% 107.3% 102.8% 96.9% 90.1% 90.0% 92.0%
██▅▃▂▂▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.58% 2.55% 2.25% 2.07% 2.01% 2.00% 1.94% 1.87%
▄▁▃▁▃█▆▁ NPA / Assets (%) 4.01% 1.81% 3.51% 1.94% 3.76% 7.32% 5.91% 2.31%
▅▁▃▁▃█▇▂ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 6.60% 2.59% 4.68% 2.67% 5.18% 9.68% 7.92% 3.50%
▅▄▃▃▃▁▁█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $17 $16 $16 $16 $16 $15 $15 $18
▁▂▄▅▇██▇ Gross Loans ($M) $73 $86 $98 $106 $122 $130 $136 $127
▁▁▂▃▆▇██ Total Deposits ($M) $103 $107 $114 $129 $151 $156 $166 $173
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate38%
C&I / Commercial53%
Agricultural9%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand15%
Interest-Bearing (core)65%
Brokered / Other20%
← PreviousThe Millyard Bank
Next →1st Bank of Sea Isle City

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?