The First National Bank of Absecon
Absecon, NJ FDIC 6442 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 0.81% +0.14 0.67%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 8.78% +0.79 7.99%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 4.02% +0.20 3.82%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 75.86% -0.26 76.12%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $1 +0.01 $1
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 0.85% -0.09 0.94%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▼ $195 -0.96 $196
Gross Loans ($M) ▼ $122 -1.10 $123
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 68.87% +0.28 68.59%
Total Deposits ($M) ▼ $176 -2.27 $178
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $18 +1.22 $17
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $18 +1.22 $17
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $20 +1.09 $19
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 68.87% +0.28 68.59%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.04% -0.01 0.05%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.90% -0.01% 0.91%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.06% -0.02 0.08%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▅▅▁▃▅▆██ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.88% 3.90% 3.73% 3.82% 3.90% 3.92% 4.01% 4.02%
▃▃▂▄▁█▇█ Return on Assets (%) 0.60% 0.62% 0.58% 0.67% 0.52% 0.82% 0.77% 0.81%
█▆▃▁█▁▂▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 82.4% 80.7% 78.4% 76.1% 82.7% 76.6% 77.4% 75.9%
▁▄▆█▇█▅▄ Cost of Funds (%) 0.76% 0.83% 0.90% 0.94% 0.92% 0.94% 0.87% 0.85%
█▆▅▄▃▂▁▁ NPA / Assets (%) 0.07% 0.06% 0.06% 0.05% 0.05% 0.05% 0.04% 0.04%
█▆▅▄▃▂▁▁ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.11% 0.10% 0.09% 0.08% 0.08% 0.07% 0.07% 0.06%
▁▁▃▄▆███ Tang. Book Value ($M) $16 $16 $16 $17 $17 $18 $18 $18
▁▅▆▇▆██▇ Gross Loans ($M) $109 $118 $121 $123 $120 $126 $126 $122
▁███▇█▆▇ Total Deposits ($M) $164 $177 $178 $178 $176 $178 $175 $176
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate95%
C&I / Commercial5%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand20%
Interest-Bearing (core)76%
Brokered / Other4%
← PreviousThe Bank of Princeton
Next →The First National Bank of Elmer

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?