Lake-Osceola State Bank
Baldwin, MI FDIC 8172 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▼ 1.60% -0.19 1.79%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 15.05% -4.97 20.02%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 4.14% +0.03 4.11%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 57.52% -6.08 63.60%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $2 +0.24 $2
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.28% -0.11 1.40%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $469 +22.26 $447
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $255 +0.15 $255
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▼ 62.39% -3.81 66.20%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $403 +23.77 $380
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $52 +7.71 $44
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $51 +8.20 $43
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $57 +8.45 $49
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▼ 62.39% -3.81 66.20%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.14% -0.04 0.18%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.27% -0.09% 1.36%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.24% -0.08 0.32%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▲ 20.06% +2.14 17.91%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
█▇▁▂▄▄▁▃ Net Interest Margin (%) 4.43% 4.33% 4.04% 4.11% 4.22% 4.22% 4.02% 4.14%
▁▁▅██▇█▇ Return on Assets (%) 0.62% 0.74% 1.29% 1.79% 1.73% 1.52% 1.77% 1.60%
▃▆██▆█▁▃ Efficiency Ratio (%) 58.2% 62.3% 64.9% 63.6% 61.2% 64.6% 54.6% 57.5%
██▅▄▃▂▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 1.57% 1.60% 1.46% 1.40% 1.36% 1.31% 1.26% 1.28%
▇█▁█▂▂▅▄ NPA / Assets (%) 0.17% 0.18% 0.12% 0.18% 0.13% 0.13% 0.15% 0.14%
▅▇▁█▂▁▄▃ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.27% 0.30% 0.20% 0.32% 0.23% 0.20% 0.25% 0.24%
▁▁▂▄▆▇██ Tang. Book Value ($M) $39 $38 $40 $43 $47 $48 $50 $51
█▆▄▁▁▂▂▁ Gross Loans ($M) $274 $267 $263 $255 $254 $258 $257 $255
▂▄▃▁▁▄█▇ Total Deposits ($M) $384 $392 $388 $380 $382 $394 $410 $403
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate70%
C&I / Commercial7%
Consumer22%
Other1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand25%
Interest-Bearing (core)68%
Brokered / Other7%
← PreviousKalamazoo County State Bank
Next →Macatawa Bank, National Association

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?