Omb Bank
Springfield, MO FDIC 8252 $2B-$5B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 1.30% +0.16 1.13%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 14.62% +1.11 13.51%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▼ 3.59% -0.00 3.59%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 47.34% -3.50 50.84%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $12 +2.69 $9
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 2.85% -0.55 3.40%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $2,359 +374.69 $1,984
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $2,059 +318.02 $1,741
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▼ 98.05% -1.22 99.27%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $2,066 +338.68 $1,728
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $208 +39.96 $168
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $206 +39.97 $166
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▼ 98.05% -1.22 99.27%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.78% -0.06 0.84%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.59% 0.11% 1.48%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.83% -0.03 0.86%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▲ 9.88% +0.27 9.61%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▂▄▆██▆▆ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.33% 3.38% 3.50% 3.59% 3.71% 3.71% 3.59% 3.59%
▁▁▁▃▅▅▆█ Return on Assets (%) 1.04% 1.06% 1.05% 1.13% 1.18% 1.18% 1.22% 1.30%
██▇▅▅▅▂▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 53.2% 52.8% 51.9% 50.8% 50.4% 50.7% 48.6% 47.3%
█▆▅▆▆▄▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 3.66% 3.42% 3.27% 3.40% 3.45% 3.18% 2.95% 2.85%
▄▁▂▆█▅▁▄ NPA / Assets (%) 0.77% 0.67% 0.73% 0.84% 0.90% 0.79% 0.69% 0.78%
█▃▅██▆▁▇ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.84% 0.72% 0.78% 0.86% 0.86% 0.79% 0.66% 0.83%
▁▁▂▄▅▆▇█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $140 $146 $156 $166 $176 $185 $194 $206
▁▂▃▄▅▆▇█ Gross Loans ($M) $1,461 $1,553 $1,646 $1,741 $1,804 $1,848 $1,948 $2,059
▁▂▃▄▄▆▇█ Total Deposits ($M) $1,429 $1,522 $1,650 $1,728 $1,741 $1,843 $1,923 $2,066
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate75%
C&I / Commercial16%
Agricultural5%
Consumer4%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand10%
Interest-Bearing (core)71%
Brokered / Other19%
← PreviousOakstar Bank
Next →Ozark Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?