Eastern Michigan Bank
Croswell, MI FDIC 982 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▼ 1.42% -0.01 1.42%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 8.27% -6.47 14.74%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 4.82% +0.73 4.08%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 48.60% -12.23 60.83%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $2 +0.16 $2
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 0.38% -0.00 0.39%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $554 +49.08 $505
Gross Loans ($M) ▼ $194 -14.00 $208
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▼ 42.33% -3.35 45.68%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $454 +2.97 $451
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $98 +46.20 $52
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $56 +4.88 $51
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $65 +2.33 $62
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▼ 42.33% -3.35 45.68%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▼ 0.22% +0.03 0.20%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 1.16% -0.00% 1.17%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▼ 0.63% +0.16 0.47%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▲ 19.57% +2.72 16.85%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▆▇▇▇▇▁██ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.60% 3.82% 3.96% 4.08% 4.06% 0.00% 4.74% 4.82%
▇█▇██▁██ Return on Assets (%) 1.20% 1.35% 1.22% 1.42% 1.45% 0.00% 1.39% 1.42%
█████▁▇▇ Efficiency Ratio (%) 58.8% 57.1% 63.6% 60.8% 59.5% 0.0% 49.1% 48.6%
█▇▇▇▇▁▇▇ Cost of Funds (%) 0.82% 0.47% 0.41% 0.39% 0.37% -1.07% 0.43% 0.38%
███▃▂▂▁▄ NPA / Assets (%) 0.36% 0.37% 0.36% 0.20% 0.19% 0.18% 0.13% 0.22%
███▂▂▂▁▄ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.90% 0.87% 0.92% 0.47% 0.51% 0.50% 0.38% 0.63%
▁▁▂▄▇▅▇█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $47 $47 $49 $51 $54 $52 $54 $56
██▃▅▄▃▂▁ Gross Loans ($M) $221 $220 $202 $208 $207 $204 $198 $194
█▄▂▁█▄▃▁ Total Deposits ($M) $499 $471 $461 $451 $503 $475 $470 $454
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate76%
C&I / Commercial11%
Agricultural6%
Consumer7%
Other1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand30%
Interest-Bearing (core)70%
← PreviousDearborn Federal Savings Bank
Next →Eaton Community Bank

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?