Royal Banks of Missouri
Saint Louis, MO FDIC 19512 $500M-$2B
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▲ 1.05% +0.30 0.75%
Return on Equity (%) ▲ 8.76% +2.19 6.57%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▲ 4.06% +0.63 3.43%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▲ 63.87% -4.75 68.62%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $4 +0.56 $3
Cost of Funds (%) ▲ 1.80% -0.26 2.06%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $1,032 +5.43 $1,026
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $808 +55.89 $752
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▲ 90.05% +6.71 83.34%
Total Deposits ($M) ▼ $892 -4.06 $896
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $128 +7.21 $120
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $111 +7.53 $104
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $115 +6.22 $109
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▲ 90.05% +6.71 83.34%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 1.59% -0.22 1.81%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.60% -0.12% 0.72%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.16% -0.43 0.59%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) ▼ 12.07% -0.05 12.12%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁▁▃▄▅██ Net Interest Margin (%) 3.16% 3.23% 3.24% 3.43% 3.60% 3.70% 3.96% 4.06%
▂▃▁▃▃▄██ Return on Assets (%) 0.72% 0.78% 0.64% 0.75% 0.76% 0.81% 1.05% 1.05%
▆▆█▅▃▃▁▁ Efficiency Ratio (%) 70.4% 69.4% 72.7% 68.6% 66.8% 66.1% 64.3% 63.9%
█▃▃▃▂▁▁▁ Cost of Funds (%) 2.68% 2.10% 2.13% 2.06% 1.98% 1.85% 1.84% 1.80%
▂▁██▄▄▄▄ NPA / Assets (%) 1.51% 1.45% 1.78% 1.81% 1.59% 1.60% 1.62% 1.59%
▂▁██▁▁▁▁ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 0.21% 0.14% 0.59% 0.59% 0.13% 0.16% 0.19% 0.16%
█▁▁▂▂▃▄▅ Tang. Book Value ($M) $122 $100 $101 $104 $105 $108 $109 $111
▄▃▁▁▄▇▅█ Gross Loans ($M) $776 $764 $745 $752 $773 $792 $779 $808
▁█▅▂▆▇▆▁ Total Deposits ($M) $893 $922 $910 $896 $912 $918 $914 $892
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate85%
C&I / Commercial13%
Other1%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand22%
Interest-Bearing (core)67%
Brokered / Other12%
← PreviousRegional Missouri Bank
Next →SULLIVAN BANK

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?