Arundel Federal Savings Bank Mutual
Glen Burnie, MD FDIC 28780 $100M-$500M
Quarter Ended
Q2'26
Data as of June 30, 2026
Quarterly Snapshot
Metric Q2'26 YoY Δ Q2'25
Profitability
Return on Assets (%) ▼ 0.16% -0.03 0.20%
Return on Equity (%) ▼ 1.17% -0.22 1.39%
Net Interest Margin (%) ▼ 2.32% -0.28 2.60%
Efficiency Ratio (%) ▼ 92.74% +2.63 90.11%
Pre-Provision Profit ($M) ▲ $0 +0.22 $0
Cost of Funds (%) ▼ 2.13% +0.02 2.11%
Balance Sheet
Total Assets ($M) ▲ $492 +44.24 $448
Gross Loans ($M) ▲ $372 +0.44 $371
Loan Growth YoY (%) ▼ 99.14% -8.68 107.82%
Total Deposits ($M) ▲ $373 +30.48 $342
Shareholders Equity ($M) ▲ $66 +1.94 $64
Tang. Book Value ($M) ▲ $66 +1.94 $64
TBV excl. AOCI ($M)** ▲ $71 +4.88 $66
Loan / Deposit Ratio (%) ▼ 99.14% -8.68 107.82%
Credit Quality
NPA / Total Assets (%) ▲ 0.37% -0.00 0.38%
Allowance / Loans (%) — 0.58% -0.02% 0.60%
Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) ▲ 0.44% -0.01 0.45%
Capital
Tier 1 Capital Ratio (%) — 0.00% 0.00 0.00%
** TBV excl. AOCI adds back unrealised losses on AFS securities to show capital excluding mark-to-market interest rate impact.
8-Quarter Trend
Metric Q3'24 Q4'24 Q1'25 Q2'25 Q3'25 Q4'25 Q1'26 Q2'26
▁▁█▅▄▄▃▃ Net Interest Margin (%) 1.98% 1.98% 3.01% 2.60% 2.49% 2.43% 2.32% 2.32%
▁▁█▆▄▄▃▅ Return on Assets (%) -0.06% -0.08% 0.35% 0.20% 0.13% 0.12% 0.07% 0.16%
██▁▃▄▄▄▄ Efficiency Ratio (%) 105.0% 106.3% 84.5% 90.1% 93.3% 94.1% 95.3% 92.7%
▇█▆▅▅▄▁▆ Cost of Funds (%) 2.14% 2.21% 2.13% 2.11% 2.09% 2.07% 1.94% 2.13%
██▁▁▂▂▁▁ NPA / Assets (%) 0.92% 0.90% 0.42% 0.38% 0.50% 0.49% 0.43% 0.37%
██▁▁▂▂▁▁ Net Charge-Off Ratio (%) 1.09% 1.08% 0.51% 0.45% 0.60% 0.54% 0.48% 0.44%
▃▁▃▄▅▆▄█ Tang. Book Value ($M) $64 $63 $64 $64 $65 $65 $64 $66
█▇▅▃▃▁▂▃ Gross Loans ($M) $383 $380 $376 $371 $372 $367 $370 $372
▁▃▂▂▁▁▆█ Total Deposits ($M) $341 $346 $343 $342 $336 $339 $361 $373
Portfolio Composition — Q2'26
Loan Mix%
Real Estate99%
C&I / Commercial2%
Deposit Mix%
Nonint.-Bearing Demand3%
Interest-Bearing (core)80%
Brokered / Other17%
← PreviousWrentham Co-operative Bank
Next →Bank of Ocean City

Help us improve this data

Is this useful? What would you add, remove, or change?